by Board Retailers Association | Apr 6, 2022 | Industry, Legal Matters, News, Shoe Market
Courtesy of https://corporate.walmart.com/photos/walmart-store-exterior-at-night Dive Brief: A federal judge issued a temporary injunction barring Walmart from selling shoes at the center of a lawsuit filed by Vans last fall.Vans, in its original complaint, alleged that Walmart “embarked on an escalating campaign to knock off virtually all of Vans’ bestselling shoes” with Walmart’s own private label lines.Walmart called Vans’ claims “weak” in a filing this year. In banning Walmart from selling the contested shoes, the judge in the case wrote that the similarities to Vans’ stripe mark were “unmistakable.” Dive Insight: At issue in the lawsuit suit filed by Vans in November are what the skate shoe brand calls more than 20 “blatant knockoff versions of Vans shoes” that Walmart sold through its own private labels, including its Time and Tru, Wonder Nation and No Boundaries brands. The shoe company argued that the marks Walmart used created confusion among its customers and that the retailer has “flooded the market with cheap, low-quality, and confusingly similar shoes that harm Vans’ goodwill and reputation.” In its lawsuit, the company is seeking to permanently ban Walmart from selling the shoes as well as monetary damages. (2021). Retrieved from Vans legal filing. Walmart, for its part, argued earlier this year that “Vans is not losing sales and its reputation is not being diminished” and that the brand, owned by VF Corp, “is not suffering any irreparable harm.” The company also said, before receiving one, that a preliminary injunction would cost it sales as well as the logistical costs of removing and disposing of shoes, which Walmart estimated to be at least $1.4 million. More broadly, Walmart argued that many of the elements the...
